Chapter 3 · Group portrait

People: how Poles live, work and feel

A society ageing faster than any other in the Union, yet still living together and rating its life 7.7 out of 10 — the third-highest score in the EU. Poles work the longest week in Europe after the Greeks, go to university more often than the average European (women especially), marry ever less often and later — and one chart dispels the myth of “the tallest nation”.

Before we turn to the economy, a few numbers about the people who make it. Poles today are a society halfway along the road: no longer young (median age 43.4, still 39.6 in 2015) but still younger than the EU average; ever better educated and working more than almost anyone in Europe, yet living with their parents longer and marrying less often than ever. This chapter gathers what the registers and surveys of Eurostat, GUS and CBOS say about Poles: who they are, how they live, what they study, how much they work, how they rate their own lives — and how much regional Poland differs from Warsaw in all this. The dark sides here are two: health (a life three years shorter than in the EU, too little exercise) and demography, which has a chapter of its own (chapter 15).

Fig. 3.1

Poles in twelve numbers

Who they are, how they live, how they work and how they feel — as of 2024/2025

Poles in twelve numbers37.3 minhabitants31 Dec 2025; down 157k in a year(GUS)43.4 yrsmedian ageEU 44.9; in 2015: 39.6(Eurostat, 1 Jan 2025)2.8people per household2nd largest in the EU afterSlovakia; EU 2.351%of 25–34-year-olds livewith their parentsmen 59%, women 43%; EU 30%3.7marriages per 1,000inhabitants2024; below the EU (3.9) forthe first time; 2010: 6.045%of 25–34-year-olds holda degreewomen 54.5%, men 36.3%; EU44.8%78.8%employment rate(20–64)EU 76.1%; women 73.2% — abovethe EU40.1 hworking week2nd longest in the EU afterGreece; EU 37.3 h7.7/10life satisfaction3rd in the EU; EU 7.2 (2025)78.5 yrslife expectancyEU 81.5; men 74.8 against 78.9 inthe EU198,125people named Nowakthe most common surname;Kowalski/a: 133,89722.1 mpeople of Polish descentabroadin 138 countries; USA 10 m(MFA/GUS)
  • Women are 51.7% of the population (107 women per 100 men); 59% of Poles live in towns and cities — 15 points below the EU average
  • The countryside is over 2 years younger than the cities; 25–34-year-olds living with their parents: 51% (EU 30%)

Twelve numbers that describe not the state but the people. Nine of them show a society wealthier, better educated and more satisfied with life than the stereotype allows; two — marriages and life expectancy — show where Poland lags the rest of the Union; one — median age — says where it is heading.

Two surprises for a reader from abroad: Poland is one of the least urbanised countries in the EU (59% of the population in towns and cities against an EU average of 75%) and one of the most “family-based” — households are larger, and there are a third fewer one-person households than the EU average.

Fig. 3.2

A race nobody wanted to win: Poland is ageing 80% faster than the EU

Median age of the population, years; as of 1 January, 2015–2025

A race nobody wanted to win: Poland is ageing 80% faster than the EU39 yrs40 yrs41 yrs42 yrs43 yrs44 yrs45 yrs46 yrs20152016201720182019202020212022202320242025EU27 44.9 yrsPoland 43.4 yrs2015: Poland 3.2 years younger thanthe EU2025: only 1.5 years leftPolandEU27
  • Median age 2015 → 2025: Poland 39.6 → 43.4 years (+3.8); EU 42.8 → 44.9 (+2.1); the gap narrowed from 3.2 to 1.5 years
  • People aged 65+: 15.4% → 21.0% of the population in a decade (EU 19.1% → 22.0%); for every 100 children under 15 there are now 148 people aged 65+
  • Old-age dependency (65+ per 100 people aged 15–64): 22.2 → 32.7 (EU 29.0 → 34.5) — at this pace Poland draws level with the EU before 2030

Poland is not (yet) an old country — it is the country ageing fastest. In ten years the median age rose by 3.8 years, almost twice as fast as in the Union, and the youth advantage of more than three years in 2015 shrank to a year and a half. The share of seniors jumped from 15% to 21% — in 1990 it was 10%, while children under 15 were then 24% of the population (today 14%).

The pace, not the level, is the real message of this chart: the process the rest of Europe spread over two generations is happening in Poland within one. Its causes — record-low fertility and the post-2004 emigration — and its consequences for the labour market and pensions are covered in chapter 15.

Fig. 3.3

A Poland growing and shrinking at once: a decade in seventeen regions

Population change 2015 → 2025 (as of 1 January), %, NUTS-2 regions

A Poland growing and shrinking at once: a decade in seventeen regions−0.1%Lesser Poland−7.6%Silesia−0.4%Greater Poland−6.9%West Pomerania−6.3%Lubusz−2.4%Lower Silesia−7.5%Opole region−7.0%Kuyavia-Pomerania−9.3%Warmia-Masuria+1.1%Pomerania−7.1%Łódź region−10.8%Holy Cross−9.7%Lublin region−6.6%Subcarpathia−7.6%Podlaskie+11.4%Warsaw−7.0%Mazovia (regional)−11.4%+11.4%0.0%population change 2015–2025NUTS-2 REGIONSWarsaw capital region+11.4%Pomerania+1.1%Lesser Poland−0.1%Greater Poland−0.4%Lower Silesia−2.4%Lubusz−6.3%Subcarpathia−6.6%West Pomerania−6.9%Mazovia (regional)−7.0%Kuyavia-Pomerania−7.0%Łódź region−7.1%Opole region−7.5%Silesia−7.6%Podlaskie−7.6%Warmia-Masuria−9.3%Lublin region−9.7%Holy Cross−10.8%Poland overall−4.0%
  • 2015 → 2025: Poland −3.97%; Warsaw capital region +11.45%, Pomerania +1.15% — every other region shrank
  • Largest losses: Holy Cross −10.84%, Lublin region −9.67%, Warmia-Masuria −9.34%; Mazovia regional (Mazovia without Warsaw and its ring) −7.00%
  • The “Mazovia” aggregate (+3.28%) hides a split inside one voivodeship — hence a map at NUTS-2 level

Two Polands on one map. Warsaw with its ring is growing (11% in a decade — more than many a European state), and so is Pomerania with the Tricity; Lesser Poland and Greater Poland hold steady. All the rest is shrinking, most sharply the eastern borderlands and the Kielce region, but also Silesia, the Opole region and Łódź. Mazovia shows why the map has seventeen fields rather than sixteen: as a whole it grew 3%, but without Warsaw it lost 7% — as much as Podlaskie.

This is a map of internal migration and fertility, not only of emigration: the young move to five or six metropolises, and the regions they leave are at the same time the oldest (chapter 15, map of the 65+ share) and the poorest (the regional-GDP map in the same chapter).

Fig. 3.4

The year Poland stopped marrying more often than Europe

Crude marriage rate per 1,000 inhabitants, 2010–2024

The year Poland stopped marrying more often than Europe0123456720102012201420162018202020222024EU27 3.9Poland 3.72020: pandemic — 145k weddings2024: 3.7 — below the EU (3.9)PolandEU27
  • Crude marriage rate: 6.0 per 1,000 (2010) → 3.7 (2024); EU 4.4 → 3.9 — in 2024 Poland fell below the EU average for the first time
  • Number of marriages: 228k (2010) → 135k (2024), −41%; 133k in 2025 (GUS). Divorces flat for 15 years: 1.6 per 1,000 (EU 1.6)
  • Age at first marriage: women 26.1 → 28.9, men 28.4 → 31.6 (2010 → 2024); mother's age at first birth 28.7 (EU 29.9)

In 2010 Poles married a third more often per thousand inhabitants than the average European; in 2024 the two lines crossed. Not because Poles divorce more often — the divorce rate has stood still for fifteen years, exactly at the EU level — but because the wedding is postponed and ever more often skipped: women marry almost three years later than in 2010, men more than three, and the share of births outside marriage rose from 21% to 29% (EU: 41%).

Read it together with the next chart: Poles leave the family home later, marry later, become parents slightly earlier than other Europeans — and have the fewest children in their history (chapter 15).

Fig. 3.5

Where a thirty-year-old lives: every second Pole aged 25–34 — with their parents

Share of people aged 25–34 living with their parents, %, 2025

Where a thirty-year-old lives: every second Pole aged 25–34 — with their parents0%20%40%60%80%51.0%58.7%43.0%30.1%35.6%24.3%TotalMenWomenPolandEU27
  • 25–34-year-olds living with their parents (2025): Poland 51.0% (men 58.7%, women 43.0%); EU 30.1% (35.6% / 24.3%)
  • The paradox: the estimated age of leaving home is 26.8 years — almost the EU figure (26.3); in 2021 it was 28.4
  • Household size: 2.8 people (EU 2.3; Slovakia 3.1, Lithuania 1.8); one-person households: 24.9% (EU 35.7%)

More than 20 percentage points above the EU average: every second Pole between 25 and 35, and almost three in five men of that age, live with their parents. Behind it are housing prices (chapter 15), late marriages and a multi-generation family model that shows up in the statistics as one of the largest households in the Union and one of the lowest shares of people living alone.

An honest nuance: those who do move out do so at an age close to the EU's (26.8 against 26.3) — and earlier than as recently as 2021. The family home in Poland is thus not a trap with no exit, but a longer stop: cheaper, comfortable and socially accepted.

Fig. 3.6

Who goes to university: Polish women more often than European women, Polish men less often than European men

Share of people aged 25–34 with tertiary education (ISCED 5–8), %, 2025

Who goes to university: Polish women more often than European women, Polish men less often than European men0%20%40%60%80%54.5%36.3%45.2%50.5%39.3%44.8%WomenMenTotalPolandEU27
  • Tertiary attainment at 25–34 (2025): Poland 45.2% (EU 44.8%); women 54.5% against 50.5% in the EU; men 36.3% against 39.3%
  • A gender gap of 18.2 points — far wider than in the EU (11.2); women are 65.6% of graduates, third in Europe after Iceland and Latvia and second in the EU itself (EU 57.9%)
  • Across the whole 25–64 group: 40.0% hold a degree (EU 36.9%), up 6.3 points in four years

Poland is a country of educated women: more than half of Polish women under 35 hold a degree, more than in the EU, and women make up two-thirds of university graduates — the third-highest share in Europe. Men are on the other side of the average: clearly fewer of them study than in the Union, and the gap between the sexes (18 points) is two-thirds wider than the EU average. Polish women are not Europe's record-holders, though — 54.5% is the 15th result in the EU, four points above the average; Poland's record is the share of women among graduates.

The second message is less comfortable: the education boom of the 2000s is fading. The share of young people with a degree has stopped growing and is slipping, while the rest of the Union catches up — the quality of those degrees and the standing of Polish universities are the subject of chapter 7.

Fig. 3.7

The second-longest working week in the Union — and one of the least often worked from home

Average usual weekly hours of work in the main job, employed people aged 20–64, 2025

The second-longest working week in the Union — and one of the least often worked from homeGreece41.0  hPoland40.1  hRomania40.0  hBulgaria39.9  hCyprus39.8  hPortugal39.8  hCroatia39.6  hHungary39.5  hMalta39.5  hSlovenia39.5  hSlovakia39.5  hCzechia39.3  hLithuania39.2  hLatvia38.8  hSweden38.7  hLuxembourg38.0  hEstonia37.9  hSpain37.6  hItaly37.3  hFrance37.2  hBelgium36.5  hFinland36.4  hIreland36.3  hAustria35.9  hGermany35.0  hDenmark34.6  hNetherlands33.0  hEU27: 37.3 h
  • Usual weekly hours (20–64, 2025): Poland 40.1 h; EU 37.3 h; Greece 41.0 h, Netherlands 33.0 h. The gap to the Netherlands: 7.1 h a week, more than 6 weeks of work a year
  • Employment rate 20–64: 78.8% (EU 76.1%) — in 2019 Poland was level with the EU; women 73.2% (EU 71.3%); the self-employed are 17.8% of those in work (EU 13.1%)
  • Working from home (2025): 6.1% usually + 10.2% sometimes = 16.3%; EU 8.9% + 14.4% = 23.3% — Poland 19th in the EU for “usually” working remotely

Poles work a lot, and almost all of them work: the employment rate, level with the EU's in 2019, is now almost three points higher, and the average working week — 40 hours — is the second longest in the Union. Part of the difference is structural (fewer part-time jobs than in the West), but even among full-time workers Poland exceeds the EU average. One in six workers is self-employed — a third more often than the EU average.

A telling juxtaposition: the country that works the longest is also one of those least often working from home — the pandemic peak of remote work (9% in 2020) quickly receded, and today 6% of Poles “usually” work remotely against 9% of Europeans and 21% of Finns.

Fig. 3.8

Satisfied with life: Poles on the Union's podium, above Germans and the French in every age group

Average rating of overall life satisfaction, 0–10 scale, people aged 16 and over, 2025

Satisfied with life: Poles on the Union's podium, above Germans and the French in every age groupRomania7.8Finland7.8Poland7.7Austria7.7Denmark7.7Belgium7.6Ireland7.6Malta7.6Netherlands7.6Slovenia7.6Czechia7.4Croatia7.4Cyprus7.4Luxembourg7.4Slovakia7.4Sweden7.4Estonia7.3Lithuania7.3Portugal7.3Spain7.2France7.1Italy7.1Hungary7.1Germany7.0Greece6.9Latvia6.9Bulgaria6.3EU27: 7.2
  • Average overall life satisfaction (0–10, people aged 16+, 2025): Poland 7.7 — third place, tied with Austria and Denmark; Romania and Finland 7.8; EU 7.2; Germany 7.0; Bulgaria 6.3
  • By age: 16–29 7.9 (EU 7.5); 35–49 7.9 (EU 7.3) — the lead over the EU is largest here (+0.6); 65+ 7.6 (EU 7.1)
  • Trend: 7.3 (2013) → 7.7 (2018) → 7.5 (2021) → 7.7 (2025); trust in other people did not rise over the same period (chapter 14)

This is one of the numbers that most surprises a reader from outside: Poles — supposedly the complainers — rate their lives 7.7 out of 10, better than the people of Germany, France, Sweden and Spain, and in the Union only Romanians and Finns score higher (Austrians and Danes share third place). The result has been stable since 2018, with a pandemic dip in 2021, and is above the EU average in every age group — seniors included, against the intuition about a “hard Polish old age”.

Context matters: this is self-assessment, not an index of living conditions, and the same nation scores below average in surveys of social trust (chapter 14). Poles are ever more satisfied with their own lives and unchangingly distrustful of others — a tension that runs through this whole portrait.

Fig. 3.9

A country of one foreign language: very good English, no second language

Number of foreign languages known, people aged 25–64, % of population, 2022

A country of one foreign language: very good English, no second language0%10%20%30%40%50%60%27.1%47.4%20.5%5.0%25.3%37.6%24.7%12.3%noneonetwothree or morePolandEU27
  • Adults aged 25–64 who know at least one foreign language (2022): Poland 72.9%; EU 74.7%. Two or more: 25.5% against 37.0%; three or more: 5.0% against 12.3%
  • EF English Proficiency Index 2025: Poland 15th of 123 countries (13th of 37 in Europe), 600 points — the “very high proficiency” band; reading 612, speaking 518
  • Progress: the share with no foreign language at all fell from 32.9% (2016) to 27.1% (2022); in the EU from 31.8% to 25.3%

Poles know foreign languages about as often as the average European — but usually one. Almost half of adults report exactly one foreign language (EU: 38%), and only one in four two or more (EU: 37%); one Pole in twenty speaks three languages, against one European in eight. That one language is almost always English, and at a high level: in the EF index Poland is in the world's top fifteen, with the typical asymmetry — we understand and read better than we speak.

A practical takeaway for a reader from abroad: in the cities and among people under forty you will get by in English without trouble; German, once Poland's second language, has given way, and Russian survives mainly in the older generation.

Fig. 3.10

The myth of the tallest nation: Poles grew 14 cm in a century — but the Dutch and the Czechs grew more

Average adult height by year of birth, cm, Poland, birth cohorts 1896–1996

The myth of the tallest nation: Poles grew 14 cm in a century — but the Dutch and the Czechs grew more150  cm160  cm170  cm180  cm190  cmNetherlands, men born 1996: 182.5 cm18961906191619261936194619561966197619861996Men 177.3  cmWomen 164.6  cmborn 1996: 177.3 cm — 34th in theworldMenWomen
  • Average height of the 1996 birth cohort (measured at 18–19): men 177.3 cm, women 164.6 cm — 34th and 33rd of 202 countries
  • A century: men 163.7 cm (born 1896) → 177.3 cm (+13.6); women 150.5 → 164.6 (+14.1). Growth has stalled: cohorts 1976 → 1996 added only 0.5 cm
  • Tallest men born in 1996: Netherlands 182.5 cm, Belgium 181.7, Estonia 181.6, Latvia 181.4, Denmark 181.4; Czechia 180.1, Germany 179.9

The stereotype — held by Poles themselves too — is that Poles are among the tallest nations on earth. The data do not bear it out: a man born in 1996 stands 177 cm on average, which puts Poland in the fourth ten — behind the Dutch, the Scandinavians, the Balts, the Balkans, the Czechs and the Germans. What is true in this story is the scale of change: in a hundred years Polish men and women grew 14 cm, fastest in the post-war decades of better nutrition and health care.

Just as important is the stall: between the 1976 and 1996 cohorts only half a centimetre was added. Adult height is a good summary measure of childhood — and it suggests that the easy reserves (better food, fewer diseases) have already been used up.

Fig. 3.11

We quit smoking but never started moving: body and habits

Health and lifestyle of Poles against the EU — five indicators

We quit smoking but never started moving: body and habitsINDICATORPOLAND AGAINST THE EULife expectancy at birth, 202478.5 yrsEU 81.5 — three years shorter; men 74.8 against 78.9 in the EU (a 4.1-year gap);the sex gap in Poland is 7.4 yearsDaily smokers (15+), 201918.4%exactly the EU average (18.4%); down from 21.9% in 2014 — one of the fasterdeclines in the Union; men 23.0%, women 14.2%Meeting WHO aerobic-activityguidelines, 201919.7%EU 31.0%; 17.1% in 2014 — slow improvement, still a third below the Union“I never exercise or playsport”, 202265%EU 45%; worse only in Portugal (73%) and Greece (68%)Internet use, people aged 65–74,202560.6%EU 79.0% — the widest generational gap in the set; the young (16–24): 99.7%against 98.8% in the EU
  • Life expectancy (2024): 78.5 years against 81.5 in the EU; men 74.8 against 78.9 — a gap of 4.1 years; women 82.2 against 84.1
  • Daily smokers (15+, 2019): 18.4% — exactly the EU average; in 2014 21.9% (EU 19.0%). Meeting WHO aerobic-activity guidelines: 19.7% (EU 31.0%)
  • “I never exercise or play sport” (2022): 65% of Poles against 45% in the EU — the third-worst result after Portugal (73%) and Greece (68%)

The gravest shadow in this chapter concerns neither money nor mood but the body. Poles live three years shorter than the average EU resident, and Polish men more than four; the pandemic loss has been recovered (the trough of 75.4 years in 2021), but the distance to the EU has not narrowed. One thing has clearly improved in the last decade: smoking, which fell to the EU level after decades of distinctly higher rates.

Exercise remains the weak point: only one Pole in five meets the physical-activity guidelines, and two-thirds say they never exercise — more than in any EU country except Portugal and Greece. Add the digital gap between generations: the youngest Poles are online more often than their EU peers, seniors much less often.

Fig. 3.12

Nowak, Kowalski, Wiśniewski — and the return of Zofia, Antoni and Leon

Most common surnames in Poland, number of living people (male + female form), thousands, PESEL register, as of 20 Jan 2026

Nowak, Kowalski, Wiśniewski — and the return of Zofia, Antoni and LeonNowak198.1 kKowalski / Kowalska133.9 kWiśniewski / Wiśniewska107.3 kWójcik96.3 kKowalczyk95.3 kKamiński / Kamińska92.5 kLewandowski / Lewandowska90.7 kZieliński / Zielińska88.5 kSzymański / Szymańska85.9 kWoźniak85.6 kDąbrowski / Dąbrowska84.9 kKozłowski / Kozłowska73.1 k
  • Most popular names given in H2 2025: Zofia (4,415), Zuzanna, Maja, Laura, Hanna; Nikodem (5,772), Antoni, Leon, Jan, Aleksander
  • “Grandparent” names are back: Zofia, Antoni, Leon, Franciszek, Ignacy, Stanisław — all in the top ten
  • The PESEL register holds several hundred thousand surnames; 48% more people are called Nowak than Kowalski/Kowalska

The three most common Polish surnames — Nowak, Kowalski, Wiśniewski — are also three types: from the “new” arrival, from the blacksmith and from the cherry tree; then come surnames from trades, places and first names, and the ending -ski, once a mark of nobility, is today the most ordinary of Polish endings. The most popular surname is borne by 198 thousand people — in a country of 37 million that is under half a percent, a sign of great surname diversity.

First names speak of the times: the parents of the 2025 cohort reach for the names of their grandparents and great-grandparents. Zofia, Antoni, Leon, Franciszek, Ignacy and Stanisław are back in the top ten, and Nikodem — a name that was a rarity twenty years ago — is today number one among boys.